HUMANAE VITAE #11 according to Wikipedia in an exvlisnteey researched and footnoted entry not a lay sight offering it's version of the church teachings. Since the church is so straightforward in it's support of it's theology why substitute a lay man's writings. Also, the tract was about birth control, not sexual relations and some myth about it only being about procreation. Let me ask you if he had made that many jokes about gays or blacks wouldn't you repudiate him? Why do we allow our Ethical Society to become a platform for anti-Christian speech?